Literary tiffs: an early spring update
Literary tiffs aren't what they used to be back in the days when Mary McCarthy famously said of Lillian Hellman that every word she wrote was a lie, including the articles "a," "and," and "the," or when Norman Mailer threw a drink in Gore Vidal’s face and sucker-punched him, only to have Vidal to rise from the floor with the taunt: "Once again, words fail Mr. Mailer."
That said, the dust-up caused by
poet and New Yorker staff writer Dana Goodyear's long, withering
piece on the effect eccentric pharmaceutical heiress Ruth Lilly's
$200 million bequest has had on Poetry Magazine and the Poetry Foundation
in the Feb. 19 and 26 double issue has certainly set tongues wagging across the
literary world.
If you didn't catch the piece
entitled "The Moneyed Muse: What can $200 million do for poetry?"
here is a link:
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070219fa_fact_goodyear
In the March 11th issue
of The New York Times Book Review, the Times new poetry columnist/reviewer
David Orr attacked Goodyear’s piece, questioned her motives and that of the New
Yorker, and defended John Barr, the former Wall Street executive who has set
up a new regime at Poetry.
As a longtime reader of all three
publications, I’ve shared some of Goodyear’s concerns since Joseph Parisi, the
longtime editor of Poetry, resigned less than year after the Lilly bequest was
announced.
Goodyear’s piece is worth reading
just for Billy Collins’ tongue-in-cheek proposal on how to spend the entire
bequest: “I suggested that the Poetry Foundation buy a ship, an Aristotle
Onassis-type, hundred-and-ninety-foot luxury cruiser. You’d call it the Poetry
Boat, and take it around the coast of the world, then back it into the harbor
in Saint-Tropez and I could give a reading on the stern.”


Recent Comments